very action has an equal and opposite reaction. This can be easily applied to humanity. X kills Y, Y kills X for killing Y, X kills Y for killing X for killing Y. This theorem in science is a flaw in humanity.

When group X has power and does action 1, Y takes power and does action -1. Because X was very tyrannical and action 1 was done by X, action 1 must be wrong and action -1 must be done by Y as to not be wrong like X. This law in science is a flaw in humanity.

It is a flaw because it is a never-ending cycle and yields no gains. But to want gains is to want a change. Let current powers equal X and I am Y; i want to change because I'm unhappy with how X runs things. Is to want progression a supporter of this theory? To describe humanity as a science is false, some actions are congruent with such scientific theories, but not all. X needs to be more like Y and Y needs to be more like X in order to fight this scientific law.

But in fighting this law (let this law equal X) we must not try to be Y but be both. Action 1 must not turn into action -1 and action -1 must not turn into action 1. Action 1 must be action 0 and action -1 must be action 0. We must not fight this law in order to fight it; to fight this law is to perpetuate this law.

[link]